Thursday, October 02, 2003

Arguing the meaning of "is"

Outside Probe of Leaks Is Favored:
"Confronted with little public support for the White House view that the investigation should be handled by the Justice Department, Bush aides began Wednesday to adjust their response to the expanding probe. They reined in earlier, sweeping portrayals of innocence in favor of more technical arguments that it is possible the disclosure was made without knowledge that a covert operative was being exposed and therefore may not have been a crime."
Uh, no. It's a crime. If they "didn't know" they were exposing a covert operative, that's criminal negligence on top of their criminal venality and stupidity. (Nor, as I understand it, would it provide any defense against the existing laws. I don't believe that Poppy's law provides any defense for sheer idiocy.) They're lying, tap-dancing, and proving as evasive as Slick Willie himself. So much for the grown-ups and the "party of personal responsibility."

At least some Republicans get it, though.
"'He has that main responsibility to see this through and see it through quickly, and that would include, if I was president, sitting down with my vice president and asking what he knows about it,' the outspoken [Senator Chuck] Hagel [R-Neb.] said Wednesday night on CNBC's Capital Report."
The White House's response? Slime Wilson.
"'He is someone, given his politics, who is obviously prone to think the worst of this White House,' Gillespie said by telephone."
Yeah, someone who donated a FREAKIN' GRAND to their campaign is going to naturally think the worst of them. Sure.

(/) Roland
Bush/Cheney '04: The last vote you'll ever have to cast.

Ashcroft's Bias Exposed

The Gray Lady has finally gotten on the job with a vengeance:
Deep political ties between top White House aides and Attorney General John Ashcroft have put him into a delicate position as the Justice Department begins a full investigation into whether administration officials illegally disclosed the name of an undercover C.I.A. officer.

Karl Rove, President Bush's top political adviser, whose possible role in the case has raised questions, was a paid consultant to three of Mr. Ashcroft's campaigns in Missouri, twice for governor and for United States senator, in the 1980's and 1990's, an associate of Mr. Rove said on Wednesday.

...

Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, said she was particularly concerned about the past campaign work that Mr. Rove did for Mr. Ashcroft. "Given allegations about the involvement of senior White House officials and the past close association between the attorney general and those officials, the investigation should be headed by a person independent of the administration," Ms. Pelosi said.
Apparently, so have the Democrats.

Sooner or later, the Rovians are going to realize that this isn't going to go away, no matter how much they slime Ambassador Wilson or do "classified information" hand-waving. The only question is, will any of them still be in office by then?

(/) Roland X
Two-Fisted Liberals, Unite! (And keep swinging!)

Wednesday, October 01, 2003

Blair Is History

Hesiod has the scoop:
MAGGIE MAY DAY: Simply splendid. Noted pinko, anti-American, soft-on terrorist, Al-Qaeda sympathizer, Margaret Thatcher, has come out against the war in Iraq. Or, at least, Britain's participation in same.
Do the Tories want to make political hay out of this? Absolutely. But they backed the war initially.

So, who are the Lib Dems putting forth for prime minister? ;^)

Note: Here's what Baroness Thatcher had to say (from the article linked above):
"Britain should never have been involved and it will be very difficult to get our troops out in anything like the near future," she told Tory peers at a private meeting last week.

She also believes a judicial inquiry should be set up into the Iraq conflict rather than the "tightly defined" Hutton inquiry.
Aside: apparently, my favorite counterspinner got this from the equally excellent Alterman:
You know you've got a stupid war if you can't even get Maggie Thatcher to get behind it. I know what Bush's problem is, but what in the world could have possessed Tony Blair?
IMO, the only real question remaining is this: how badly will Blair's now-inevitable fall damage Bush?

(/) Roland X
Don't hold back, Your Excellency, tell us how you really feel.

Rove and Ashcroft, sitting in a tree...

Short post, since it's late and some of us have to work for a living.

However, after seeing this post by Billmon, I had to pick up the challenge. It was tough tracking down the connection, but lo and behold, that left wing rag comes through again:
Ashcroft was not an accidental choice for attorney general. Before Sept. 11, his conservative credentials on judicial nominees, enforcing federal pornography laws and protecting gun owners' rights were good. Karl Rove, Bush's trusted political adviser, had handled Ashcroft's political campaigns and Majority Leader of the Senate Trent Lott, R-Miss., favored his nomination.
And Tom DeLay wants us to believe that there's no conflict of interest here. Riiight. This is why Janet Reno investigated Monica Lewinsky, after all. No, wait...

(/) Roland X
Being that hypocritical must be hard work, but they make it look so easy...

Real Republicans Tell The Truth

Republicans as a whole are not our enemies. Neither are real, classic conservatives. They are our rivals, but many are noble and honorable people. Larry Johnson, former CIA official, is one of them:
To hear Bob Novak parsing words like a Clinton lawyer defining sex is outrageous. Sure, they didn't call him, he called them but they volunteered the information. They took the initiative to divulge the CIA officer's name. And that is outrageous.

...

Let's be very clear about what happened. This is not an alleged abuse. This is a confirmed abuse. I worked with this woman. She started training with me. She has been undercover for three decades, she is not as Bob Novak suggested a CIA analyst.

...

I say this as a registered Republican. I'm on record giving contributions to the George Bush campaign. This is not about partisan politics. This is about a betrayal, a political smear of an individual with no relevance to the story. Publishing her name in that story added nothing to it. His entire intent was correctly as Ambassador Wilson noted: to intimidate, to suggest that there was some impropriety that somehow his wife was in a decision making position to influence his ability to go over and savage a stupid policy, an erroneous policy and frankly, what was a false policy of suggesting that there were nuclear material in Iraq that required this war. This was about a political attack. To pretend that it's something else and to get into this parsing of words, I tell you, it sickens me to be a Republican to see this.
Incidentally, I actually watched this episode of News Hour. Mr. Johnson's words, direct as they are, don't quite convey the barely restrained outrage of this clearly honorable man who is furious to see knives sticking out of the backs of two good people (Mr. and Mrs. Wilson).

Meanwhile, Newsmax, that left-wing rag (that's sarcasm, son), had this to say:
13) We need to reverse things: if the Clinton White House had sold out an active-duty CIA agent as 'payback' for some whistle-blowing article, we would be outraged. This crime is no less serious because it was done in a Republican White House.

14) Long ago, in a piece entitled "Bush's Achilles Heel," I wrote that this Bush's weakness was the entire mystery, secrecy and sometimes-illegality of the intelligence community. This Plame leak now threatens to become a huge story - involving lawbreaking, revenge, abuse of power and the inevitable cover-up. Plus the 10 Democrats running for President and the media are going to have a field day with it.
And here's a quote from an American he saved during his standoff in Baghdad:
Wilson may laugh now, but in the eyes of hostages, he was a hero. "He stuck his neck out in our behalf . . . He worked so hard to keep us from falling apart," recalled Roland O. Bergheer, 75, a Bechtel Corp. manager who was trapped in Baghdad.

A conservative who lives in Las Vegas, Bergheer added: "I love Joe Wilson. . . . I don't give a damn what his politics are."
The same article has this to say on the first page:
In 1990, while sheltering more than a hundred Americans at the U.S. Embassy and diplomatic residences, he briefed reporters while wearing a hangman's noose instead of a necktie -- a symbol of defiance after Hussein threatened to execute anyone who didn't turn over foreigners.

The message, Wilson said: "If you want to execute me, I'll bring my own [expletive] rope."

This toughness impressed President George H.W. Bush, who called Wilson a "truly inspiring" diplomat who exhibited "courageous leadership" by facing down Hussein and helping to gain freedom for the Americans before the 1991 war began.
Yeah, now there's a man who hates the Bush family.

So it is in everyone's interest, not just progressives, to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs. We're just more likely to enjoy it.

(/) Roland X
Two-Fisted Liberal (who respects honest conservatives, two-fisted or otherwise 8^)